In this candid remark, Nobel contrasts his approach to peace with that of pacifist movements. He suggests that tangible deterrents might be more effective than dialogues and treaties. There's a hint of skepticism toward the efficacy of conferences and debates in resolving deep-rooted conflicts. Nobel's words challenge us to examine the mechanisms we rely on to maintain peace. Is the threat of destruction a more potent motivator than the aspiration for harmony? His vision reflects a pragmatic, albeit controversial, strategy that continues to influence international relations today.